bgire Dim 16 Aoû 2009 - 10:08
Si vous lisez bien l'une des réactions à l'article Anglais cité en référence :
This article is misinformation, and has been jumping from one news source to another. There is no way the meteorite was travelling at that speed and hit him, it would have taken off his entire arm. The original german article on this actually has the boy saying it streaked him/grazed him. Not bounced off his arm. No one has analyzed the rock at all, again, it was a misquote and the scientist from Germany actually said "IF it was a space rock, it would be very valueable etc..." not that it was. Meteorites are usually only warm when they hit the ground, not smoldering. It's more probable, if this happened at all, that the kid was struck by debris from the impact on the road which caused the scar.
Il apparaît :
- qu'on ne sait pas si c'est une météorite
- que le garçon a plus probablement été touché par un éclat du revêtement de sol projeté par l'impact de cet objet.
C'est fou comme l'info est rapidement déformée, juste d'un article (Allemand) à l'autre (Anglais).